WeavePrism
11 tasks ranked · free

Best LLMs for coding & code review

Code generation, refactors, reviews, debugging. Every model in the catalog, ranked three ways and priced at a realistic 20M input / 5M output tokens a month for this task.

Balanced pick
DeepSeek V3.2

What the engine picks on the default cost/quality/speed mix before you touch a slider.

Highest quality
Claude Opus 4.5

Top task score (99/100) at $225/mo for this volume.

Budget pick
DeepSeek V3.2

The cheapest model that stays close to the leader on quality — 89/100 at $7.70/mo.

Fit to your volume

The ranking above prices a typical month. Enter your own coding & code review volume and, if you like, a monthly ceiling — the picks re-rank as you type. No signup.

Models for Coding & code review, ranked by quality per dollar at your volume
ModelQualityPer month Value
GPT-5 nano OpenAI72$3.0024.00
Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral74$3.5021.14
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google70$4.0017.50
Grok 4.1 Fast xAI82$6.5012.62
DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek89$7.7011.56
Qwen3 235B Alibaba (Qwen)86$8.809.77
Llama 4 Maverick Meta80$9.658.29
GPT-5 mini OpenAI85$15.05.67

Value = quality points per dollar of monthly spend at your volume. Quality scores are benchmark-informed estimates, not evals — validate on your own workload before migrating.

Price your own coding & code review volume

These rankings use a typical monthly volume. Plug in your real token counts and the free estimator re-ranks every model on cost and quality.

Open the estimator

Embed the live pick

A self-updating SVG badge of the balanced pick for coding & code review. Drop it in a README or blog — it re-renders the day the catalog changes.

![Best for coding](https://weaveprism.com/api/embed/best/coding.svg)

Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Quality scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not evals — validate on your own workload before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider. Compare Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3.2