Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B
Qwen3 235B costs 96% less at typical usage ($0.39 vs $10.0 per 1M tokens). Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on 11 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.5 | Qwen3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $5.00 | $0.22 |
| Output /1M | $25.0 | $0.88 |
| Typical /1M | $10.0 | $0.39 |
| Context window | 200k | 256k |
| Speed | Measured | Brisk |
| Privacy | Strong | Self-host |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Claude Opus 4.5
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Qwen3 235B
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding99/86
Agents99/84
Reasoning98/88
Writing96/83
Chat92/84
Classify90/84
Extract92/84
Summarize94/85
Translate90/88
Vision93/30
General96/84
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks Claude Opus 4.5, Qwen3 235B and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare Claude Opus 4.5
Also compare Qwen3 235B
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.