DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-4.6
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 69% less at typical usage ($0.32 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens). DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on 8 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.28 | $0.60 |
| Output /1M | $0.42 | $2.20 |
| Typical /1M | $0.32 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 128k | 200k |
| Speed | Brisk | Brisk |
| Privacy | Self-host | Self-host |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
DeepSeek V3.2
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
GLM-4.6
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding89/88
Agents85/86
Reasoning90/86
Writing84/83
Chat85/84
Classify84/83
Extract85/84
Summarize86/85
Translate85/85
Vision30/30
General86/84
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks DeepSeek V3.2, GLM-4.6 and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare DeepSeek V3.2
Also compare GLM-4.6
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.