DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5 nano
GPT-5 nano costs 56% less at typical usage ($0.14 vs $0.32 per 1M tokens). DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on 10 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.28 | $0.05 |
| Output /1M | $0.42 | $0.40 |
| Typical /1M | $0.32 | $0.14 |
| Context window | 128k | 400k |
| Speed | Brisk | Blazing |
| Privacy | Self-host | Standard |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
DeepSeek V3.2
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
GPT-5 nano
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding89/72
Agents85/68
Reasoning90/74
Writing84/76
Chat85/80
Classify84/82
Extract85/80
Summarize86/80
Translate85/80
Vision30/78
General86/76
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks DeepSeek V3.2, GPT-5 nano and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare DeepSeek V3.2
Also compare GPT-5 nano
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.