DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.1
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 91% less at typical usage ($0.32 vs $3.44 per 1M tokens). GPT-5.1 scores higher on 11 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.28 | $1.25 |
| Output /1M | $0.42 | $10.0 |
| Typical /1M | $0.32 | $3.44 |
| Context window | 128k | 400k |
| Speed | Brisk | Brisk |
| Privacy | Self-host | Standard |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
DeepSeek V3.2
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
GPT-5.1
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding89/94
Agents85/93
Reasoning90/96
Writing84/92
Chat85/93
Classify84/88
Extract85/89
Summarize86/91
Translate85/90
Vision30/94
General86/94
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks DeepSeek V3.2, GPT-5.1 and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare DeepSeek V3.2
Also compare GPT-5.1
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.