DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 3.3 70B
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 45% less at typical usage ($0.32 vs $0.58 per 1M tokens). DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on 11 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.28 | $0.54 |
| Output /1M | $0.42 | $0.68 |
| Typical /1M | $0.32 | $0.58 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Speed | Brisk | Blazing |
| Privacy | Self-host | Self-host |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
DeepSeek V3.2
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Llama 3.3 70B
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding89/76
Agents85/72
Reasoning90/77
Writing84/80
Chat85/84
Classify84/82
Extract85/80
Summarize86/82
Translate85/82
Vision30/25
General86/78
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks DeepSeek V3.2, Llama 3.3 70B and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare DeepSeek V3.2
Also compare Llama 3.3 70B
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.