DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 24% less at typical usage ($0.32 vs $0.42 per 1M tokens). DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on 9 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.28 | $0.27 |
| Output /1M | $0.42 | $0.85 |
| Typical /1M | $0.32 | $0.42 |
| Context window | 128k | 1M |
| Speed | Brisk | Fast |
| Privacy | Self-host | Self-host |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
DeepSeek V3.2
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Llama 4 Maverick
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding89/80
Agents85/78
Reasoning90/82
Writing84/82
Chat85/86
Classify84/83
Extract85/82
Summarize86/84
Translate85/84
Vision30/85
General86/82
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks DeepSeek V3.2, Llama 4 Maverick and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare DeepSeek V3.2
Also compare Llama 4 Maverick
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.