Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 235B
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 55% less at typical usage ($0.18 vs $0.39 per 1M tokens). Qwen3 235B scores higher on 10 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.10 | $0.22 |
| Output /1M | $0.40 | $0.88 |
| Typical /1M | $0.18 | $0.39 |
| Context window | 1M | 256k |
| Speed | Blazing | Brisk |
| Privacy | Standard | Self-host |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Qwen3 235B
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding70/86
Agents62/84
Reasoning70/88
Writing74/83
Chat79/84
Classify82/84
Extract79/84
Summarize80/85
Translate82/88
Vision80/30
General74/84
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen3 235B and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Also compare Qwen3 235B
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.