GLM-4.6 vs Llama 3.3 70B
Llama 3.3 70B costs 42% less at typical usage ($0.58 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens). GLM-4.6 scores higher on 10 of 11 tasks.
| Spec | GLM-4.6 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.60 | $0.54 |
| Output /1M | $2.20 | $0.68 |
| Typical /1M | $1.00 | $0.58 |
| Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Speed | Brisk | Blazing |
| Privacy | Self-host | Self-host |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
GLM-4.6
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Llama 3.3 70B
Steady since we started tracking (Jul 13, 2026)
Quality by task
Coding88/76
Agents86/72
Reasoning86/77
Writing83/80
Chat84/84
Classify83/82
Extract84/80
Summarize85/82
Translate85/82
Vision30/25
General84/78
Price your own prompt against both
The free estimator ranks GLM-4.6, Llama 3.3 70B and every other catalog model by cost and quality for your exact workload.
Open the estimatorGet notified when either model's price changes
We watch the catalog for list-price changes. Opt in with just an email, no account, and unsubscribe in one click anytime.
Also compare GLM-4.6
Also compare Llama 3.3 70B
Prices are list $/1M tokens, hand-maintained from public provider pricing. Task scores are benchmark-informed 0-100 estimates, not gospel — validate on your own evals before moving production traffic. Not affiliated with any model provider.